AMD Ryzen 3 5300G Review - snowdensaidence

We recently checked out AMD's Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600G processors featuring Vega graphics in the hope that perhaps these Apus might present a valid stop-interruption resolution for Personal computer gamers holding out for meliorate art poster pricing.

As discussed in our review, the R7 5700G doesn't make sense at the rather high $360 asking Leontyne Price, and we feel AMD of necessity to slash just about $100 off that price to even consider it. Although it packs 8 cores and 16 threads, the chip packs only half the L3 cache of fully-fledgling Zen 3 parts, such every bit the Ryzen 7 5800X, meaning the 5700G is much slower for CPU related tasks, including play with a distinct GPU.

The more low-cost $260 Ryzen 5 5600G is better, though we still believe it's overpriced and should be positioned closer to $200. But we could at the least imagine a few scenarios where the 5600G would atomic number 4 a viable option. Now, what many budget-conscious PC gamers were hoping for was a repeat of the Ryzen 3 3300X, but with integrated graphics for around $160. Basically a Ryzen 3 3400G replacement, just lamentably we ne'er got information technology, sort of.

The Ryzen 3 5300G is a 4-core / 8-thread processor featuring 6 CU integrated Vega artwork... the problem is, you can't buy it, or at to the lowest degree non without all the bits that induce IT work. You see, the 5300G is an OEM-only part, but unlike the 5600G and 5700G which spent their first 4 months of existence in OEM only status before organism released into the retail channel, the 5300G is set to be an OEM sole indefinitely.

The reason for this likely goes down to supply, as AMD wants to avoid a repeat of the Ryzen 3 3100 and 3300X. In order to reach a 5300G, AMD is using defective silicon that couldn't be binned for use as a 5600G. The Ryzen 3 only requires 4 working cores, 8MB of L3 cache and 6 CUs.

For AMD, the 5300G serves deuce main purposes: it allows them to tour some of that defective silicon into cash, while also allowing them to service the OEM market with budget-friendly Ryzen parts that don't require a discrete graphics wag. Thus, they're not fascinated in releasing a retail 5300G that to meet the inevitable demand, would bear to dedicate working silicon that could be used for the 5600G and peradventure equal the 5700G, atomic number 14 they could score them a good deal more money.

This is why the Ryzen 3 3100 and 3300X disappeared from shelves so quickly. Yields were good enough that working silicon was bound for use as a Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 3700X instead than ensuring supply of cheaper Ryzen 3 parts.

The Ryzen 3 5300G isn't a cut down version of the original Zen 3 parts, merely rather it's another large die, so it's a Cezanne start out and is therefore a split down version of the 5600G and 5700G, with only a quarter of the cache of the mainstream Ryzen 5000 CPUs.

With that big drop in L3 cache, No uncertainty there's going to be a negative impingement on performance, though as we recently disclosed, with only 4 cores active, you can get absent with a smaller L3 cache as at that place bu aren't plenty cores to take vantage of larger buffers. As for clock specifications, the 5300G boosts to 4.2 GHz with a dishonourable frequency of 4 GHz and that way the max hike is 200 MHz turn down than the 5600G and 400 MHz turn down than the 5700G.

We know why there South Korean won't be a retail adaptation of the Ryzen 3 5300G, but if you have the chance to buy out an OEM potato chip, operating theatre are looking at a system using it, how well does it perform? To find oneself dead we need to get into the benchmarks, and for this we've split the testing up into three sections...

First, we're going to search exclusively at CPU operation, testing the 5300G in applications exploitation an RTX 2080 Ti so we can compare it to the repose of our Mainframe data. Irregular, we require to look how comfortably it works with the Vega iGPU, comparing it with a number of otherwise joint graphics solutions and entry-charge graphics cards.

Then at last, we've besides run many distinct GPU tests using the GeForce RTX 3090, allowing U.S. to compare the 5300G to a range of separate CPUs with a powerful graphics card, showing us what kind of headroom this APU offers gamers, should they upgrade down the go after. Let's get into IT.

Benchmarks

Starting with Cinebench, we see that the 5300G's multi-core performance is roughly equivalent to that of the 6c/12t Ryzen 5 2600, so neat for a quad-core processor. It's also not a tidy sum slower than the Core i5-10400F, trailing past a 15% margin.

Piece the performance isn't amazing, if this were a $160 APU, I call up this result would follow considered precise good.

The reason for the stronger than expected multi-core result when compared to parts like the R5 2600 and i5-10400F is due to the strong single core operation.

The 5300G scored 522 points and that means for one-woman core performance in this workload information technology's just 4% slower than the Core i5-11400F, so a mighty fulgurous result there.

The 7-zip fastener compression performance is weaker than what we saw in Cinebench, here the 5300G trailed the R5 2600 by a 10% margin and the i5-10400F by a 19% margin. That said, it was a massive 85% faster than the Ryzen 5 3400G... rather the extreme upgrade.

The 5300G falls boost behind the R5 2600 for decompression work, trailing by 18%, though it was just 9% slower than the i5-10400F. And so we see that the tolerance over the 3400G has been significantly reduced, but still the 5300G was a good second faster offering 29% greater performance.

The Ryzen 3 5300G is able-bodied to lean connected its strong single pith performance in the Adobe After Effects benchmark, matched what are typically much faster CPUs such as the Ryzen 7 3700X and Core i7-10700K. When compared to the 3400G the new 5300G was 26% faster, so another strong performance upheaval there.

We're seeing a similar thing with Photoshop which solitary heavily utilizes 1 - 2 cores, and this plays to the 5300G's advantage allowing it to check what are typically much faster CPUs much a the 3700X, 10600K and R5 3600.

Adobe brick Premiere Affirmative tends to utilization much more of the CPU and arsenic a result the 5300G is situated right towards the bottom of our graph with a tally of impartial 561 points. Surprisingly, this meant the 5300G wasn't any faster than the 3400G in this test.

In Blender, the 5300G was 22% faster than the 3400G, 16% slower than the R5 2600 and nigh 40% slower than its bigger brother, the Ryzen 5 5600G.

Power Consumption

An advantage of the 5300G when compared to the more powerful 5600G is that it sips magnate. Here we're look total system consumption of just 111 watts when using an RTX 2080 Ti, au fon the same steady of power as the 3400G, only with 20+% better performance in this test.

Interconnected Graphics Performance

Poignant on to iGPU examination, we'll start with Assassin's Creed Valhalla victimisation the lowest possible quality settings at 1080p. Here the gillyflower 5300G was good for just 26 fps connected norm, which is basically the same flush of execution delivered by the old 3400G.

With the iGPU overclocked to 2.4 GHz, we were able to cope with the stock 5600G with 31 fps, a decent improvement.

The 5300G was slightly faster than the 3400G in Rainbow Six Military blockade, interpreting 52 fps on average, an 11% improvement. Overclocking boosted performance by a further 17%, allowing for 61 fps on average, and that's slightly better than a lineage 5600G.

Horizon Zero Dawn is a contend at 1080p and for playable functioning you'd probably have to cast off the resolution equally low every bit 720p. Over again, overclocking boosted operation by 17% and although non terribly useful at 1080p, at lower resolutions this gain could come in selfsame handy.

The faster clocks result in a big 32% performance uplift in Shadow of the Grave Raider and that makes a real difference to how wellspring the game plays, going from a very laggy 28 fps on modal to a much smoother 37 fps average. Imposingly, this saw the 5300G go from only duplicate the 3400G stock to mimicking the performance of the stock 5700G.

Moving on, we have Doom Unending and here the 5300G was good for 40 fps, which is a solid out of the box experience. Once overclocked I was able to push it adequate to 47 fps, so an 18% improvement there.

See Dogs: Legion is another game like-minded Assassin's Religious doctrine Valhalla or Celestial horizon Zero Dawn that you'll need to play at 720p to ward of a slideshow. Stock the 5300G was good for just 23 FPS and overclocked to the max it simply provided 28 FPS.

As you'd await Counter-Take up: Global Unpalatable plays very well using the medium quality preset at 1080p and scorn offering just 7% greater performance over the 3400G, the 5300G was good for 89 fps, so a great gaming go through.

It is possible to achieve playable performance in F1 2020 out of the box with the 5300G, rendering 46 Federal Protective Service on the average. It's also accomplishable to boost performance by a further 20%, pumping taboo 55 FPS and at this point the 5300G is enabling quite an enjoyable gaming experience.

For the last iGPU bench mark we have Dota 2 and this gage runs rather well happening the 5300G, though we're only talk about an 11% boost over the 3400G. Lag, our overclock improved performance aside a far 15% to 70fps, about what the RX 550 delivers in this title.

Gambling Performance (dGPU)

Now here's how the Ryzen 3 5300G performs when opposite with the GeForce RTX 3090. Granted, no one is aiming to distich those deuce put together, but the idea is to show Mainframe pocket-size gaming carrying out, thus if you were to buy a to a greater extent powerful graphics card in a few geezerhood sentence, this is how the 5300G would perform relative to other parts under CPU small-scale gaming conditions.

The F1 2020 execution surely International Relations and Security Network't bad with roughly 200 FPS on average and a 1% low of 160 fps, almost twice that of the 3400G, so a monolithic promote there. The 5300G also beat the R5 2600 quite convincingly and wasn't a great wad slower than the R5 3600, so I'd say overall quite ample result here.

Next up we have Rainbow Six Siege, where the 5300G just edged ahead of the R5 2600 and that made IT unrivaled of the slowest CPUs proved, and by roughly margin. Although it was a massive 42% faster than the 3400G, it was also 27% slower than the 5600G and 18% slower than the R5 3600. Overall, peck of frames were existence pushed exterior present despite the fact that the 5300G was more than slower than modern 6c/12t parts.

Moving on to Horizon Zero Dawn which International Relations and Security Network't a very CPU demanding statute title, at to the lowest degree by today's standards, we see that the 5300G is able to match the R5 3600, allowing it to outpace the 3400G past a whopping 36% security deposit. It was also just 12% slower than the Ryzen 5 5600G, so ane of the better results for the quad-core 5300G.

THe 5300G appears to do intimately in Borderlands 3 when look the average physical body rank, nevertheless if we turn our attention to the 1% low performance you'll see that IT's significantly slower than the R5 2600 and really everything just the 3400G.

We're only speaking about a 13% advance in 1% low performance from the 3400G, making the 5300G 35% slower than the 5600G.

Performance in Watch Dogs: Horde is more of the same, the 5300G is but able to match the R5 2600 and while that meant information technology was still 50% faster than the 3400G when comparing 1% low performance, IT was also 27% slower than the 5600G.

The Ryzen 5 3400G completely tanked in Demise Stranding, dropping down as small A 41 FPS for the 1% low result. That meant the 5300G was over 2.5x faster, over again matching the Ryzen 5 2600, though it was a little over 20% slower than the 5600G.

The 5300G struggled relative to the 6c/12t processors in Tail of the Tomb Raider, trailing the R5 2600 past a 9% margin and only beating the 3400G by 12%. Then when compared to the Ryzen 5 5600G we're looking at a 30% drop in operation.

In Hitman 2, the 5300G was able to margin hardly ahead of the R5 2600, allowing for 104 fps on the average, qualification it 15% slower than the 5600G. Still, when compared to the old 3400G we'rhenium looking a big 65% step-up in performance.

Here's a feel at the average performance seen crossways the 10 games tested. Eastern Samoa you can assure, the 5300G is similar to the Ryzen 5 2600, making it 12% slower than the R5 3600, and almost 20% slower than the 5600G. Inactive, when compared to AMD's net retail quad-core APU, we're sounding at a 45% operation improvement on ordinary.

What We Learned

The Ryzen 5 5300G won't blow your socks off, but that was never the intention nor expectation. Compared to the Ryzen 5 3400G, which is based on the 2nd-gen Zen+ architecture, the 5300G is a huge advance on the Processor side, thanks to quicker Dose 3 cores.

For gamers, the 5300G is a good first appearance-level CPU despite only offering 4 cores with SMT substantiate, performance was generally good and significantly better than older quad-cores much as the 3400G. There were still or s instances where frame metre performance wasn't cracking, but you're likely going to be very unforced to live with that at the right cost.

It's hard to laurels the 5300G a value paygrad given it's an OEM-only product, but if it were available at retail for between $150 - $170 -- the same price range Eastern Samoa the 3400G and ~$100 less than the 5600G -- and so IT'd be a decent deal. Granted, the Marrow i3-10100F tail end often be had for just $110, just IT's a slower C.P.U. and the iGPU is basically unavailing for gaming, making the 5300G a more well-rounded merchandise.

Unfortunately, we'll never get the opportunity to incur excited over the 5300G as you'll get to purchase it in an entry-level OEM machine and those typically aren't very good. The 2021 H.P. Pavilion that I purchased to grab the 5300G is the same background PC we bought to rack up an early review of the 5700G, and technically speaking, it's not great.

Likewise the fact that you let to deal with proprietary motherboard power connectors and a custom PSU, the components aren't very good. The motherboard features a weak 5-phase VRM without any cooling, so expect a limited raise path on that circuit card. If you could steal the 5300G and time slot it on an entry-level B550 motherboard that would make for a of import combo with a becoming upgrade path for either a more powerful CPU or graphics card in the future.